Winning Criminal Defense Strategies That You Should Know About

Oct 15
08:18

2012

Mario Cora

Mario Cora

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

In the court room, both sides - the plaintiff and the indicted will have legal strategies in play to ensure they win the case. When accused of a crime, the strategies used to get you off the hook need to be rock-solid.

mediaimage
If you observe the workings of any courtroom,Winning Criminal Defense Strategies That You Should Know About Articles you will realize that the criminal defense strategy employed by the lawyer will be anchored around mental correctness and the masterful use of words. Variations can be found among criminal cases, so it follows that the criminal defense strategies also vary. Although one strategy is effective for one case, it does not automatically mean that it would have the same successful results when used in another.

To start with, a good strategy would be to stick to the truth and the facts of the case. The client would have to lay all the facts out on the table so the lawyer will be fully informed. Note, that what is considered as the 'truth' has variations in it, which the attorney and the client will exploit as their defense for the case. A good example is a case of murder. There are many reasons why the murder was perpetrated. Perhaps the client was provoked into it, or maybe he was being attacked and had to defend himself, resulting in the crime. These truths can be very useful when the attorney and the client are working out how to come up with a defense that could help him get an acquittal.

The truth will have three elements in which the attorney will push the client to stick to just one and win the case. If the client admits that he did commit the crime, it is the lawyer's responsibility to look into and assess the various mitigating factors that caused the event. If the client repudiates the accusations, the lawyer will push for facts that clear indicated that his or her client is vindicated from events. The third variation of the truth is has elements of the first and the second variation whereby, the clients confesses of having seen the events take place and/or is partially involved, but denies have committed the deed. The strategies and tactics that will be used to plan the defense would be based on how the client responds to these three elements.

Then the attorney will take all the facts presented by the client, bring the facts as per the police statements and do some comparisons. Loopholes will be sought out in this stage, and it is also a good way for the lawyer to see the weakness in the police statements that he could capitalize on for his defense. An attorney with the actual facts will be in a better position to come up with a consistent defense that will clear the client of any wrongdoing. Using this truth, the prosecutor's claims will be discredited. There are even times when the lawyer will twist the prosecution's words and make it work in favor of the client.

The other strategy is to familiarize the accused with the defense. Basically, you would bend the truth as far as the facts would allow, and the client would have to be careful to avoid lying about anything that could backfire on the defense. Some coaching will be required where the client will be told exactly what would happen when they take the stand and what they will say. The lawyer will subject the client to mock interviews and cross-examinations. He will act as the prosecution and ask the questions that are sure to crop up during the trial. Doing this would give your story more credibility since you will have a solid criminal defense.