How to Get FLASH Indexed by the Search Engines

-- is the
"window" that lands on top. This is important to understand
because that's how we're going to perform the magic.

FLASH over, RELEVANT CONTENT under = SE indexability

By now you've probably deduced we're going to layer our relevant
content exactly beneath our FLASH movie. By doing so, the site
visitor will see only the FLASH movie in their browser while the
search engine will find, and index, the "relevant content"
because search engines "view" only the source code of the page
(not the browser version) and they index only the TEXT they find
within that source code.

To better illustrate how this might look, we enlisted the help of
Web designer Dave Barry of SmartCertify Direct --
http://www.smartcertify.com/. Dave was kind enough to create an
example site employing a transparent FLASH movie to help us
visualize the effect. As Dave explains...

"This flash movie was made transparent so you may see the effects
of putting text behind flash. Using Dynamic HTML, you can
absolutely position a flash object right over top of your
existing html code. Search engines see copy and text while
visitors see your dynamic flash movie."

To see Dave's example, visit the complete article found at the
below URL, and look for "Flash Sample." Once there, click
anywhere in the browser window, hold down CTRL and hit "A" on
your keyboard (Ctrl+A = highlight all) to see how this sample
FLASH movie would otherwise "hide" the text were the FLASH not
transparent.

(To view the Flash Sample, visit this article online at
http://www.academywebspecialists.com/newsletters/0702.html)

Dave was kind enough to share with us the source code he used to
create the effect, which can also be found the above URL.

It should be noted this effect works only in browsers that
support HTML version 4.0 or greater. This is only a minor
concern, however, as the vast majority of browsers that are being
used today are compatible.

Yes, but will the Search Engines tolerate the "trick"?

Obviously the most pressing question is whether or not the search
engines will accept, or reject, pages that make use of this
strategy. After all, the possibility of layering irrelevant
content under, or even entirely off the page (by assigning minus
positioning coordinates) is a distinct possibility.

To anticipate how the search engines might view this strategy,
once again, we consider the issues of "intention" and
"relevancy."

Perhaps Stephen Baker, Director of Business Development and
Marketing at FAST, said it best when he remarked, "Our position
is pretty straight forward...it's not the technique that we are
concerned about, it's the intention. If we index the text in Z-
Order and CSS and it's relevant to the content, then we're all
happy. But, as you know, we do have internal systems that trip
wires all of the time. If a particular technique becomes heavily
abused over time, we'll definitely stop indexing information
through said technique."

As we've said countless times before, certain legitimate Web site
enhancements, like FLASH, frames, dynamic content, etc., are a
nightmare for the engines to index. They simply have never done a
very good job on complicated HTML page, and FLASH poses, perhaps,
the greatest indexing challenge of them all.

Regardless, sites that use these upscale tools have as much right
to be found as any others within their selected keyword
categories. Projecting a professional image to your potential
customers is important, and using Z Order within your CSS gives
enables you to obtain that professional image without sacrificing
search engine findability.

Copyright 2002 Robin Nobles. All rights reserved.