Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint Articles
Friday, August 23, 2019
 
Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint ArticlesRegisterAll CategoriesTop AuthorsSubmit Article (Article Submission)ContactSubscribe Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint Articles
 

Anthony Ricigliano – Google, Verizon, and the End of Net Neutrality

The people at Google, who have always bent over backwards to avoid the "evil" tag applies to Microsoft, apparently decided that a little evil that's fine, if it means that control over the Internet.

The people at Google, who have always bent over backward to avoid the “evil” tag applied to Microsoft, have apparently decided that a little evil is ok if it means control of the internet. As announced with Verizon, the policy framework they are proposing would be the first giant step toward the corporate takeover of the internet and the end of “Net Neutrality”.

Let’s backtrack a little and talk about real Net Neutrality. What this means is that internet service providers, like Anthony Ricigliano Verizon, must guarantee that all web sites and internet technologies are treated equally, whether it’s CNN or a grandmother who wants to blog about knitting. Neutrality allows for anyone to distribute information and media content, whether it’s a video of cats doing tricks or a personal account at the scene of a disaster. This neutrality enables anyone with a website the ability to find an audience and has served as the main reason for the explosion of internet users around the world.

The proposal put forth by Google and Verizon essentially tries to reverse the openness of the internet back to a model where ISP’s like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast as well as companies like Google can decide on a pecking order of who can distribute information and how it’s done. The size of the stakes is huge as in the very near future all video, radio, phone and other services will soon be delivered through an internet connection.

Starting with wireless networks, the Anthony Ricigliano Google and Verizon policy statement allows ISP’s to do anything they want from blocking websites to making distributors pay to have their sites available for viewing. Wired networks get the lip service of non-discrimination but the standards are so weak that websites can be blocked as well. The proposal would split the internet into two classes with the upper class mandating paid access for content and applications while the secondary level would remain for everyone else.

ISP’s would also regulate which applications would be prioritized instead of allowing internet users to decide for themselves. If Verizon has a crummy application that is competing against one with all the bells and whistles, this model could effectively enable Verizon to crush small competitors offering higher quality apps. This is not far removed from the big three auto makers crushing small competitors in their early days.

The pact also does its best to eliminate regulation by turning the FCC into a quasi-complaints department while true monitoring would be relegated to a committee either controlled or made up of people from the industry. Self regulationArticle Submission, in the form of “We are professionals and we know what we’re doing” delivered the BP disaster to the Gulf. Google and Verizon are taking the same type position regarding the regulation of their proposed version of the internet.

Source: Free Articles from ArticlesFactory.com

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Anthony Ricigliano Net Neutrality thrives with 25 years of integrating the latest technological advances into business operations; Anthony Ricigliano Google Verizon is a point man capable of establishing and managing state of the art infrastructure to maximize operational efficiencies.



Health
Business
Finance
Travel
Technology
Home Repair
Computers
Marketing
Autos
Family
Entertainment
Law
Education
Communication
Other
Sports
ECommerce
Home Business
Self Help
Internet
Partners


Page loaded in 0.021 seconds