Hypotheses followers in corporate

Have people in the corporate understood the true meaning and the difference between what is called ‘hypotheses and what ‘theory’ is?   What they employ the most to deal different situations in the organization?  Will they go by the way of hypotheses or theory? Which is inevitable, meaningful and appropriate? 

Can a theory be possible without hypothesis?  The question is whether one is creating a hypothesis to verify, confirm and validate another hypothesis.  How can one hypothesis confirm another?   

Hypothesis is nothing but an assumption possibility.  Theory on the other hand is a proven fact through various tests/experiments/other relevant methods. 

More often the large numbers of people in most corporate are hypotheses oriented. More so, the hypotheses orientation dominates in the very interpersonal relationship as well.  They form some postulates about others or the nature of work or about a project.  Interestingly, every one needs to form various/multiple concepts, only then they can create/innovate many things in the organization.  Achievement orientation necessarily lies in the ability of how many possibilities and probabilities one can see or create.

The major flaw or blemish they will be committing is that none of the hypotheses or probabilities or possibilities or postulates is subjected to theorization.  Instead of testing the hypothesis, they create or conceptualize another hypothesis or a concept to validate the previous one.  One doubt never can be an answer to another doubt.  Seeing the doubt beyond and verifying the truth/fact within the ‘doubt’ alone would decide the appropriateness of such ‘doubts’.

In the compelling business/market dynamics, testing a concept absolutely may cost heavy time investment and many corporate may not be interested in doing the above. Hence, it is a common habit that they try the best in confirming the assumption with another assumption. 

When people start dilates the concepts, virtually they will be adding more such doubts and not reasons or facts.  At the end, the doubts can only enlarge, become big and grow out of proportion.  At this stage, they seek or hunt desperately to find other people in the organization who are also having similar concepts. 

One needs to understand the fact that, the mind is like a clock pendulum, always oscillating from ‘to be’ to ‘not to be’ or from ‘either’ to ‘or’.  Mind never decides anything.  It only creates waves of doubts continuously.  Only the knowledge or experience or experiment or counter checking/verification alone prove the validity of the doubt/concept. 

In our mind, even the truth also forms or takes its birth as doubt or concept or hypothesis only. Be it god or ghost; be it good or bad, anything and everything appear in our mind only as concepts.  Mind never says this is right or that is right.  Unless one has the right knowledge/experience/experiment, the mind will be moving ‘hither and thither’ on the surface waves of various ‘hypotheses’ and would reach nowhere but in the deep sea of confusion.