Performance Reviews That Actually Improve Performance

Jul 31
21:00

2004

Jan B. King

Jan B. King

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

... Reviews That Actually Improve ... ... reviews are one of the most dreaded tasks by most ... It is hard to win here – you can never say enough good things, and

mediaimage

Performance Reviews That Actually Improve Performance

Employee performance reviews are one of the most dreaded
tasks by most managers. It is hard to win here – you can
never say enough good things,Performance Reviews That Actually Improve Performance Articles and one word of criticism is
generally the only thing they will remember.

Taking the easy way out and just documenting the positive
will cause you a lot of trouble if you ever need to fire the
employee.

The only way this ever gets better is with a lot of
practice, and a pretty thick skin. Think about it this way:
a bit of feedback that no one else has the guts to give a
poor performer might turn around their whole career.
Deliver the negative – you have to – but make sure the
employee knows there are things they can do about it.

For more effective performance reviews, prepare at the time
of hire by giving all employees copies of the review forms
you use in their orientation packet. An employee who knows
how she will be reviewed will direct his behavior
accordingly from the beginning of his employment and will
probably do all she can to be sure he has good reviews.

In fact, an employee should have copies of all survey and
review material that he will encounter over the course of
his employment. The perception is what you measure is what
you care about. Give a description of how often you use
each evaluation tool and how. This is particularly
important if your company does 360 degree performance
reviews. The purpose of reviews is not to trap employees,
but to give them the tools to do their best for the company.

Accordingly, your review forms should be created very
carefully and should cover actions specific to his skills
and responsibilities as well as his people skills with peers
and subordinates.

I always do reviews in two parts. The first part is for the
employee to fill out two weeks ahead of the actual review
meeting. It asks questions like these:

•What could I do to make your work more productive?
•What equipment or training do you need to do your best
work that you don't have?
•What could the company change (or add or delete) that
would help you do your work better?
•What skills and abilities do you have that you think are
underutilized?
•Any other comments or opinions you would like to express?

I have always found that getting an employee to express
their feelings first, not only lets them know that you
really are interested in their feedback, it also often
results in their letting you know what they think their
weaknesses are – meaning you don’t have to be the first to
bring these things up.

Most employees really want to do good work. And if you
think an employee isn’t really there to do good work, you
shouldn’t be reviewing them, you should be letting them go.