No amount of art or magic will help you consistently hire top people. A bit
of science, however, might just do the trick. By this I mean a series of steps
that if everyone in your company follows will allow you to hire more top people
on a consistent and repeatable basis. Following are the common threads among
the best techniques, processes, and tools I've seen and used.
No amount of art or magic will help
you consistently hire top people. A bit of science, however, might just do the
trick. By this I mean a series of steps that if everyone in your company
follows will allow you to hire more top people on a consistent and repeatable
basis.
Over the past 30+ years I've been
involved in thousands of searches, worked with hundreds of different hiring
managers, trained 3,000 to 4,000 recruiters, and worked closely with dozens of
major companies. Following are the common threads among the best techniques,
processes, and tools I've seen and used. Collectively, they add up to a
business process for hiring top people. While Performance-based Hiring provides a simplified
high-level summary of these, it's the details and execution that will
ultimately determine success.
As you review these ten steps,
evaluate your company's hiring processes to see where you stand. Although the
steps by themselves aren't overly complex, getting everyone to do them all for
every job represents the difference between consistent success and maintaining
the status quo.
Underlying this hiring process is
the idea that hiring a top person requires a company to consistently reinforce
the message that it's offering career opportunities, not just jobs. At every
step, including every ad, interview, and conversation, this must be clearly
communicated. You'll clearly see this theme in the steps below, as well as the
idea that consumer marketing, the latest Web 2.0 advertising techniques, and
consultative selling are essential tools to get this message out.
10 Steps for Hiring the Best People
Every Time
Offer WOW! jobs.
Traditional job descriptions listing skills, qualifications, and
experience are not marketing tools, nor are they predictors of job
success. These lists must be diminished in importance. In their place job
descriptions must emphasize what the person will do, learn, and become. As
part of this, clearly describe the impact the person can make. From a
marketing standpoint eliminate internal, non-descriptive titles.
"Not-for-Profit CEO – Back to the Future" was a title we used to
find the head of a major charity. In the ad we described the five-year
impact the person would have on the inner city. For bank tellers to fill a
mid-day shift we added the tagline "Are You a Desperate Housewife?"
Get everyone on the hiring team to agree to real job
needs. Before you can offer WOW!
jobs you need to get the hiring manager to clearly describe what the
person will be doing and what needs to be accomplished on the
job. By forcing the hiring manager to convert skills and qualifications
into the real performance objectives of the job, you increase both
ownership and understanding. Start by asking the hiring manager how he/she
will respond to a candidate who asks "What am I going to be doing on
this job and how will my performance by measured?" Top people ask
this question every time, so everyone on the hiring team, including the
recruiter, must understand the performance objectives of the real job.
When you don't know real job needs, the interviewing process is less
accurate, everyone substitutes their own assessment criteria, and top candidates
get confused and turned off.
Make it about careers, not compensation. The ad copy must clearly emphasize the challenges in
the job, the impact the person can make on the company, and some of the
growth opportunities. For example, "Help us launch a new Blue Tooth
headset line" is far more compelling than, "Must have five years
of RF product marketing experience." When recruiters first contact
candidates – whether they're active or passive – the emphasis must clearly
be on influencing the candidate to evaluate your opportunities as career
moves, not just as another job for more money or one closer to home. This
will help ease the negotiating process and minimize the threat of
counter-offers and competitive offers.
Implement an "early bird" sourcing strategy. At a basic level it's essential to write compelling job
ads that are easily found. This requires complete knowledge of search
engine marketing techniques to position ads high in any type of search,
whether it's Google, an aggregator, or on job boards. From a more advanced
perspective, it's important to recognize that top performers don't enter
the job-hunting market ready to hunt and peck for a job that matches their
skills and experience. Instead, they tip-toe into the market, first
contacting former associates and doing some top-down industry and company
research. If this is fruitless they'll then expand their search efforts
through aggressive networking and Googling for jobs. Sourcing programs
need to target these early entrants by positioning ads in the right places
and proactively expanding employee referral programs to ensure that the
best people contact your employees first.
Allow candidates to "just look" rather than
buy. Most company hiring processes
and career websites are designed based on the premise that candidates are
ready to apply for a specific job. This is a fundamentally flawed concept.
The best people, especially the early entrants, are just looking and
comparing options. To accommodate these people, recruiters must not push
the process too fast, and managers must be willing to talk or meet with
candidates on an exploratory basis. Career websites need to allow
candidates to chat with a recruiter in real time and look at groups of
jobs, rather than specific requisitions. The focus of all of this must be
based on the idea that while early entrants start by just looking, they
are willing to move forward in a logical sequence as long as they obtain
the proper information at each step. Ensuring they get the proper
information is key to managing this pipeline of top performers.
Use consultative selling techniques to develop a
candidate/recruiter partnership. Changing
jobs is a big deal, and in today's high-pressure work environment, time is
a precious commodity. Recruiters need to instantly engage, not take
"No" for an answer, develop relationships, uncover the
candidate's pressing career issues, obtain referrals, and offer career
solutions. Too many recruiters ask the wrong questions, lack understanding
of real job needs, come across as superficial, and dial for dollars to
make their numbers. In a highly mobile and extensively competitive market,
recruiters will take on an increasingly important role. Just like in
sales, this requires extensive training, a complete understanding of the market,
and a true partnership with their hiring leaders.
Make the interview your secret weapon. Most managers and executives think the primary
purpose of the interview is to assess candidate competency. This is
comparable to someone in sales thinking that the discovery process is used
to determine if a client is qualified to own the product, instead of
determining the client's primary needs. When the interview is viewed from
this perspective, you realize that its real purpose is to look for voids and gaps in the candidate's background
with the expectation that your job will fulfill them. For example, if the candidate
hasn't managed as large a team, or handled a comparable project, or had
the exposure your job provides, these voids become learning opportunities
and more important than compensation as reasons to accept your position.
Obviously, if the gaps are too big, the candidate is unqualified for the
job, and if the gaps aren't sufficient, the job isn't a big enough move.
In the process of conducting the interview with this focus, assessment
accuracy will increase. A major side benefit: you'll have all of the
information you need to defend the candidate from other interviewers who
make superficial decisions.
Implement a multi-factor evidence-based assessment
process. The idea of using a yes/no
voting process to make the hiring decision is superficial, time-consuming,
and prone to errors. While the interview is used to gather information, if
not organized properly, the information gathered is redundant, narrow, and
biased. Worse, since most managers don't consciously seek out
non-confirming information, nor do they assess competency against real job
needs, adding up the yes/no votes is comparable to making important
investment decisions based on information in the marketing brochure.
Assessment accuracy can increase when members of the hiring team understand
real job needs and narrow their assessment to just a few core factors. The
key here is to assess a candidate's competency and motivation to do the
work required. A formal debriefing session allows each interviewer to
share facts, details, and concrete information, rather than relying on
feelings, intuition, or technical competency to make the hiring decision.
(Here's a complete article on using our 10-Factor Candidate Assessment Scorecard to
establish this type of evidence-based assessment process.)
Use a multi-factor decision tool to negotiate the
offer, fight off the competition, and prevent counter-offers. Recruiting is not something done at the end of the
interview, it starts with first contact. While it's important for
companies to judge candidates across multiple factors, it's equally
important for candidates to evaluate different job opportunities across multiple
factors as well. Some of these include learning, growth
opportunities, compensation, quality of the hiring manager and the team,
job match, visibility, cultural fit, and work/life balance. This can be
formalized by sending the candidate a multi-factor decision form comparing your
job with all others he/she is considering, including his/her current
position. Suggest that during the interviewing process, the candidate get
specific information on each of these factors before reaching a final
decision. As long as your situation represents a positive long-term career
move, your job will often win out without compensation being the primary
reason. While you'll need to persist in ensuring your candidate obtains
the proper information, this is how you recruit candidates in today's
highly competitive and highly mobile environment – with knowledge and
insight, not heavy-handedness.
Link the hiring process with your company's performance
management system. The
use of job descriptions defining the real performance
objectives offers a natural bridge to the performance
management process used by most companies. This way, candidates are
assessed against real job needs and they're accepting offers based on
these same real job needs. This increases understanding and interest by
clarifying job expectations every step of the way. This can be reinforced
by establishing a formal pre-start (the time between offer acceptance and
the start date) and on-boarding program where the new employee and the
hiring manager clarify, agree on, and prioritize the performance
objectives. Performance can then be closely tracked and measured at
regular intervals during the first 3-6 months. This also offers a means to
measure candidate quality using the same 10-Factor Candidate Assessment Scorecard
used to initially assess the candidate. Retention and job satisfaction are
sure to increase when hiring is based on matching real job needs with the
candidate's abilities and motivating needs.
The problem with too many HR and
recruiting leaders is that they view the hiring and recruiting process as a
series of independent steps. Without the proper links, the end-to-end process
is likely to fall apart. For example, combining a great sourcing program with a
"make the candidate apply" philosophy, coupled with a clinical
behavioral interview, is sure to yield very few top performers, even though
many entered the pipeline.
The key to making the end-to-end
process work is to step back and understand the unique needs of top performers.
From this high-level strategic perspective the design of each step is
fundamentally altered. This high-level view also allows the integration between
the steps to be designed into the process at the front end rather than as an
after-thought. While converting the hiring process into a scalable business
process is no easy task, it's not nearly as hard as implementing other major
companywide business initiatives. If hiring the best is a company's number one
strategic objective, then there should be none more important, either.
Lou Adler (lou@adlerconcepts.com)
is the president of The Adler Group and Amazon best-seller author of Hire With
Your Head and the audio program Talent Rules! Using Performance-based Hiring to
Hire Top Talent. Adler is a noted recruiting industry expert, speaker, and
columnist for SHRM, ERE, RCSA, Kennedy Information, HR.com and ZoomInfo.com. To view the original article, go to (http://www.adlerconcepts.com/resources/column/newsletter/10_steps_for_hiring_the_best_e.php)