Is It Time To Visit An Art Gallery?

Nov 28
08:20

2012

Keith Barrett

Keith Barrett

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

It appears to me that there are certain myths associated with artworks. In particular, many people appear to have this feeling that you need to have a lot of money in order to take an interest in art. I would suggest that this is not true and that it's also really unfortunate that anyone should believe it to be the case.

mediaimage

As with so many misunderstandings in life,Is It Time To Visit An Art Gallery? Articles it's certainly constructive to begin by thinking about how this sort of idea originally started to gain traction. I don't actually think it's too difficult to see why some people might perceive it to be true. The problem here is that many famous paintings, in particular, change hands for large sums of money.

If you don't believe me, then simply check out some news stories relating to auctions that have taken placed within the past few years. Some of the figures that are involved are hard to believe. They are also, fairly obviously, beyond the means of most people. This offers a little insight into a certain part of the art world, but it really doesn't tell you the full story.

What it suggests is that the most famous artworks are sold for a lot of money. This is not necessarily the same as talking about the best works of art, since this certainly takes us into discussions about subjectivity and our own feelings. We may not really like a painting by Monet, for instance, but this does not indicate the fact that others will feel the same way.

There is also the assumption here that you must like a piece in order to spend a considerable sum on purchasing it. Does this actually hold true? There are certainly art collectors who see paintings and sculptures as little more than investments. This means that they attach financial value to them and are able to sideline thoughts about artistic merits.

So where does this leave the likes of you and me? It's probably fair to say that it means that we're unable to afford famous paintings, but that probably shouldn't come as a great surprise. Does it mean that we can't enjoy such pieces? I don't believe that it does mean this and I'd like to explain my reasoning. It seems to me that some artworks remain highly accessible, despite the prices that are involved.

This can be explained by the fact that they are often displayed in art galleries. Although some collectors like to hide their purchases away, such individuals are really in the minority. Many more are happy to establish galleries and to donate pieces to them. It should also be remembered that public galleries often also have outstanding collections.

What this means is that it's still possible for you to see great works of art. You may not be able to own them, but there's no reason why you shouldn't enjoy them. You can also purchase reproductions, in order to ensure that famous works of art can still be enjoyed within your own home.

Article "tagged" as:

Categories: