Exclusion of Evidence under the Canadian Charter

Jun 25
08:29

2012

Jeremy Maddock

Jeremy Maddock

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides for the exclusion of evidence that was obtained as a result of a Charter breach, but only in circumstances where admitting the evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

mediaimage

Section 24(2) of the Charter states that “where,Exclusion of Evidence under the Canadian Charter Articles in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.”

The meaning of Section 24(2) was initially fleshed out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 1987 Collins decision, where police obtained evidence of the illegal drug heroin from an aggressive and unreasonable search which was deemed to violate the Section 8 rights of the accused.

The Collins test was revisited in 2009 in the Grant case, which imposed a stricter standard for the type of Charter breach that would “bring the administration into disrepute,” and held that not every Charter breach should necessarily result in the exclusion of evidence.

The precedent set in Grant has expanded the ability of police to engage in aggressive search and seizure, essentially on a hunch, as we can see from cases such as R. v. Loewen. The current Supreme Court has made clear that only particularly aggravated or egregious Charter breaches will result in the exclusion of evidence.

Categories: