International Arbitration: Appeals of Decisions in Foreign Courts

Mar 12
06:36

2011

Jonathan W. Fitch

Jonathan W. Fitch

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Sally & Fitch LLP has extensive experience representing clients in international litigation and international arbitrations. The international cases they handle involve sizable commercial contract disputes, business-related torts, including claims for misrepresentation and fraud, admiralty and maritime matters, and actions for the enforcement of judgments rendered by foreign courts.

mediaimage
The advantages of arbitrationfor companies that transact business around the world are many: expedited resolutions,International Arbitration: Appeals of Decisions in Foreign Courts Articles lower legal costs and knowing the playing field in advance are high among them. But businesses with international contractual relationships must always take into account that an arbitration result may be subject to appeal in courts in any jurisdiction where a party attempts to enforce an award.One such scenario arose in a recent case decided by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The court was asked to review an arbitration award in excess of $20 million won by a Saudi real estate development company in a French tribunal. Two lower courts in the UK had found that the Pakistani government was not bound by the arbitration agreement, due to a legalistic distinction between states and state entities, and the highest court agreed.On the other hand, in a decision from earlier in 2010, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court refused to re-examine an arbitration award on the basis of whether it was contrary to public policy. The applicant argued for the application of the legal doctrine of pacta sunt servanda, which means "agreements must be kept." The dispute involved the contract defining the terms of the trade of a soccer player from a Uruguayan club to a Mexican club, originally heard by the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). The Swiss court's decision suggests a very narrow availability of the public policy argument in deference to contractual terms and resolutions.Such authorities as Article V (2) (b) of The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as The New York Convention, state that recognition of an award may be refused if it would be contrary to the public policy of the country where enforcement is sought. Clients must always understand that arbitration can lead to appellate litigation on foreign shores, and prepare accordingly.Securing the Advice of Counsel With International Arbitration ExperienceA range of legal actions require advice and representation from a law firm that understands the complexities triggered when payment and obligations cross international borders. Commercial contract disputes, admiralty and maritime matters, and enforcement of foreign courts judgments are common examples.By enlisting the services of attorneys who are capable of aggressive action in any forum, businesses can gain the security of knowing that their case will benefit from consistent counsel.

Also From This Author

Noncompete Agreements That Stick in Massachusetts

Noncompete Agreements That Stick in Massachusetts

Sally & Fitch LLP has been representing both employers and employees in a broad range of non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreement cases, employment discrimination actions and wrongful termination claims. They have obtained emergency, temporary, preliminary, and permanent restraining orders enforcing non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreements on behalf of employers in numerous instances.
Ongoing Arbitration for Mobil Oil Over Venezuelan Assets

Ongoing Arbitration for Mobil Oil Over Venezuelan Assets

Sally & Fitch LLP has extensive experience representing clients in international litigation and international arbitrations. The international cases they handle involve sizable commercial contract disputes, business-related torts, including claims for misrepresentation and fraud, admiralty and maritime matters, and actions for the enforcement of judgments rendered by foreign courts.
Navigating the "Same Wrongdoer" Defense in Check Fraud Cases

Navigating the "Same Wrongdoer" Defense in Check Fraud Cases

In the realm of check fraud litigation, the "same wrongdoer" defense emerges as a crucial legal shield for banks, particularly under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as implemented in Massachusetts. This defense plays a pivotal role when bank customers, after discovering unauthorized signatures on their checks, seek to hold their banks accountable. The defense stipulates that if a customer fails to report an initial fraudulent activity within a reasonable timeframe, they cannot claim recovery for subsequent forgeries by the same perpetrator. This article delves into the intricacies of this rule, its legal foundations, and its implications for both banks and customers.