In the intricate dance of democracy, the role of politicians is often shrouded in idealistic expectations about governance and public service. However, beneath the surface lies a stark reality: the primary objective of politicians is to secure their re-election. This singular focus shapes their actions, alliances, and the policies they champion. In this detailed exploration, we delve into the motivations driving political leaders, the mechanisms of leader selection, and the implications of campaign finance on the democratic process.
It's a widespread misconception that politicians are primarily tasked with job creation, economic stimulation, and the safeguarding of national welfare and integrity. Yet, the core mission of a politician is to remain in power. Their allegiance lies with their political party and its members, to whom they owe patronage, including jobs, sinecures, and access to public funds. This relationship mirrors that of a CEO to their company's major shareholders, with the politician's real constituency being the party's base.
To achieve re-election, politicians may introduce reforms and policies that benefit the general populace or avoid actions that could jeopardize their political longevity. Their decisions are often a delicate balance between public service and political survival.
The question of what qualifies one to be a leader and why individuals elect certain leaders is complex. Voters typically seek leaders who they believe can address their economic, psychological, and moral needs. These needs, if unmet, are perceived as threats to an "acceptable existence," which encompasses more than mere survival. People often prioritize their group's welfare over their own, sacrificing personal gains for the perceived good of the community.
For life to be considered honorable, certain conditions must be met, including:
The absence of these elements can lead to societal unrest as people strive to restore balance and dignity.
Leaders emit a signal that resonates with their followers' desire to improve their chances of securing basic needs and maintaining dignity. This signal comprises two elements:
The selection of a leader is a serious and contemplative process, where information about the candidate is meticulously gathered and analyzed. This includes their background, vision, associations, and public perception.
The Athenian model of direct democracy, while exclusive, allowed for active participation in decision-making. However, scaling this model to larger populations presents logistical challenges, particularly in the dissemination of information to voters.
Political candidates require significant funds to inform large constituencies about their platforms and achievements. Campaign finance laws, while intended to address the influence of money in politics, can inadvertently limit access to information and favor wealthier, more educated voters who can seek out information independently.
Reducing the size of constituencies could be achieved by transitioning to an indirect form of democracy, where direct elections are limited to manageable, volunteer-based "electoral colleges." This approach could address the distortions caused by campaign finance without undermining democratic access to information.
The role of politicians is often misunderstood, with many assuming their primary function is to serve the public good. In reality, their main goal is to secure re-election, which influences their actions and policy decisions. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for a more informed electorate and a healthier democracy.
For further reading on the influence of campaign finance on elections, visit the Federal Election Commission and explore the Center for Responsive Politics for detailed data on political contributions.
The Ubiquitous Britannica 2015
Encyclopedia Britannica is now online and as a DVD. The print edition has been discontinued.
Pears Cyclopaedia 2014-5 Edition: Human Knowledge Encapsulated
Pears Cyclopaedia is the last remaining one volume reference work.
Envy as the Foundation of Capitalism
Envy is either destructive, or, as in the case of capitalism, constructive.
