Normal 0 7.8 Å 0 2 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:nh<; mso-tstyle-rowba...
When last year's APEC informal summit decided to TPP at this year's summit will become an important issue of time, when most people are or are not aware of TPP in the media today will become a major topic, or a major issue. This issue is very clear is led by the United States, the original is composed of four small, they developed a high degree offree-tradeagreement, now mastered by the United States the right to speak, and the United States is very obvious to be aggressive in the Pacific Rim China did not want to participate in building a free trade system. Had such a free trade system, who are willing to participate and who are willing to organize, this is no problem, the problem is its name, the Pacific Rim, Pacific Rim such a free trade system, if the lack of the world's largest exporter, is missing the most important Asia-Pacific one of the economies of China, it also called the circum-Pacific strategic Economic such a system? U.S. trade protectionism, can be said in the ascendant. The U.S. economy, particularly its ability to export significantly in a recession. In this case, the United States is probably more politically, up from strategic considerations, to build such a TPP, TPP, and this is obviously that China should be excluded. Therefore, it appears to be menacing, but the United States have the ability to do this? There may exclude China, a leading a Pacific Rim free trade system? I think there is a big question there, America's own economy, its own some of the economic structural problems, are not able to solve, how to organize a possible exclusion of China, and the so-called free trade system. Of course, this is for a new challenge to China.
