Why HIV Does Not Cause AIDS

Nov 12
11:49

2008

Paul Phillips

Paul Phillips

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Contrary to popular belief, there is no evidence to show that HIV is the harmful virus it is said to be. It is one of over a hundred odd retroviruses. So called a retrovirus because of the way in which it invades the host cells in the body it infects...

mediaimage

In contrast to the general belief,there is no evidence to show that HIV is the harmful virus it is said to be. It is one of over a hundred odd retroviruses. So called a retrovirus because of the way in which it invades the host cells in the body it infects. The host cells are called the T-cells (or T-helper cells) a type of white blood cell involved in providing immunity; the body's natural defence against disease. During the early stages of infection,Why HIV Does Not Cause AIDS Articles heavy cold or flu-like symptoms manifest. About 10-14 days later the individual returns to being healthy again. Take the story of Dr Robert E. Willner. So convinced that HIV is A harmless virus and wanting to prove it to the public at large,he injected himself with the blood of an HIV-positive haemophiliac on a live Spanish television chat show! Yes, he was okay and deemed HIV negative after!

Another piece of evidence exposing the absurd idea that HIV is Harmful comes from a random sample of Japanese people. AIDS was unknown in this country. Amazingly, it was found that 25% of a random sample was found to be HIV positive.

Here are the bullet points that are well supported with evidence that HIV does not cause AIDS.

*HIV does not destroy the T-helper cells it invades.

*The number of infected T-cells are too low to cause AIDS

*There is no convincing evidence to show that there is such a thing as a 'latent period', the time lapse before HIV causes infection

*To this day, the HIV virus has never been isolated and therefore there is no empirical proof of its existence. There have been many wagers offered to the person who can successfully isolate and identify the HIV virus. So far there have been no takers.

*No one has ever been able to show that there is a gene in HIV responsible for giving rise to AIDS.

*The laboratory test method for HIV is greatly flawed and unreliable. If you are finding all this very difficult to accept,then take a look at the disclaimers that comes with the various test kits. You will clearly find that basically, they echo what I have been saying: that they are unreliable. -The punch line to all this lunacy should be made loud and clear.

Don't take the ''HIV'' test. If you are offered it then refuse at all costs!

Don't play Russian roulette with your life.