Binding Financial Agreement: What Should Take Into Account

Feb 13
11:11

2013

Marte Latim

Marte Latim

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Do you really need a binding financial agreement? Learn what are the pros and cons as well as the purposes of having one inside this article.

mediaimage
Financial agreements could be entered by any two people who are married or are preparing to marry. Financial agreements are binding - in that sense they are very difficult to overturn - but they need to fulfill the official requirements specified by section 90G of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”) to achieve this status: the agreement must be written. An oral agreement won’t suffice. It is because they are quite complicated reports,Binding Financial Agreement: What Should Take Into Account Articles and specificity is critical; both sides must receive independent legal advice from a legal practitioner. This advice must tell each of you what the agreement means for you, when it comes to your rights, and the advantages and drawbacks of the agreement. It is encouraged that you get these tips in writing; the agreement must have a clause stating you have each acquired such advice; a finalized certificate from the legal practitioner attesting to these suggestions must be coupled to the agreement; each party must sign the agreement; finally, each party must have either a copy or the original of the financial agreement.



These steps essentially avoid either party from saying they were not conscious of the implications of the agreement when they accessed into it. When is a Financial Agreement Not Binding? Although they offer comparable assurance, financial agreements are not rock solid and they can be overturned in a few very specific occasions. Section 90K of the Act lists the first few circumstances, notably where: any of the above official steps have not been satisfied; you have not disclosed, or have concealed or misrepresented, the extent of your assets and resources at the time you accessed into the agreement; it is impracticable for the agreement to be carried out, for instance; a modification has occurred associated with a child which will cause that child to go through hardship; or you accessed into the agreement by fraud, or for the purpose of defrauding another.



Your legal adviser can offer additional information on these, especially as certain standard clauses in financial agreements might be void. For instance, section 90F overturns any clause that prohibits the courts from instituting a maintenance agreement if, at the time, the other party was unable to support themselves.



A financial agreement can be overturned by contract law, because they're, basically, a contract. A full breakdown of these situations is beyond the scope of this article, but in conclusion, they arise in the act of getting one party to sign the agreement, the other party engaged in conduct that was highly unethical or fraudulent; the agreement is vague and it is unclear what it promises to do; either party forced the other person to sign the agreement; or both parties sign a new agreement terminating the financial agreement.



Many of these factors, however, should be handled by your legal practitioner when you obtain advice as to the financial agreement. Due to the difficulties involved with drafting a comparatively intricate document, it is recommended you also use your practitioner to draft, or help draft, your financial agreement. This will help ensure it is binding, and provide the mandatory safety to the two of you should the relationship break apart.

Also From This Author

Deciphering Financial Agreements in Relationships

Deciphering Financial Agreements in Relationships

Understanding financial agreements in relationships, particularly in the context of same-sex and de facto relationships, is crucial. Previously, the dissolution of such relationships often led to protracted and tiresome litigation in the Supreme Court. However, the introduction of section 90UD of the Family Law Act 1975 has significantly changed this scenario. This provision allows individuals in de facto relationships to agree on a fair distribution of assets and financial resources post-separation. This development has brought de facto agreements on par with those enjoyed by married couples, ensuring equal rights for same-sex relationships, a move applauded by many gay rights groups.
Navigating Financial Settlements in Relationships: A Guide to Binding Financial Agreements

Navigating Financial Settlements in Relationships: A Guide to Binding Financial Agreements

In the realm of relationship breakdowns, the legal landscape has evolved to offer more streamlined solutions for asset and financial distribution. The introduction of section 90UD of the Family Law Act 1975 marked a significant shift, allowing de facto and same-sex couples to create Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs) akin to those available to married couples. This change has been celebrated by advocates for equality, as it ensures that all couples have access to fair and efficient means of settling their financial affairs post-separation.
Navigating Binding Financial Agreements in Australia

Navigating Binding Financial Agreements in Australia

When couples in Australia decide to marry or enter a de facto relationship, they often consider creating a legal document that outlines the division of their assets and finances in the event of a separation. Known as a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA), this contract can serve as a prenuptial, postnuptial, or separation agreement. A BFA can provide clarity and control over asset division, potentially reducing the emotional and financial strain of legal disputes. However, specific legal requirements must be met for a BFA to be enforceable. This article delves into the nuances of BFAs in Australia, offering guidance on their creation, enforceability, and the circumstances that may render them invalid.