Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint Articles
Tuesday, July 23, 2019
 
Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint ArticlesRegisterAll CategoriesTop AuthorsSubmit Article (Article Submission)ContactSubscribe Free Articles, Free Web Content, Reprint Articles
 

DiBona on Google's Open Source Philosophy

Chris DiBona, the open source program manager for Google, shares his philosophy.  Read Lora's summary on how Google is implementing the Summer of Code.

Google often gets a bad rap when it comes to “open source citizenship” because many don’t think the company gives back as much open source code as it uses. And its lack of support for the Affero General Public License (AGPL) v3 doesn’t help matters. But as News.com writer Stephen Shankland found, Google’s open source program manager, Chris DiBona, isn’t all that worried about what open source businesses or open source evangelists think about Google. His philosophy is to focus on the open source developers:

I asked myself, “Who am I trying to address?” The world of open-source business? No. The world of the open-source enthusiast? No. I’m really looking to work with open-source developers. We came up with these goals for our group: to support open-source development in general, which means to support open-source infrastructure; support the release of open-source code, from Google and in general; and to create more open-source developers….

That’s what Google’s Summer of Code program is about, DiBona says — making sure the college students who want to spend a summer programming rather than at some completely unrelated job, have a place to do that.

Nonetheless, the company does use “a ton” of open source, and it’s a balancing act to make sure Google is giving enough back:

Google is releasing every year, not counting Android or the really large open-source projects like GWT, a new project every two or three weeks. Or patching hundreds of projects a month. I conservatively estimate we’re releasing about a million lines of code a year from the company….If you talk to open-source developers–people who are working on projects–I think they understand that. It came back to who do we want to interact with.

As for the company’s refusal to use the AGPL, DiBona simply says:

We’ll still keep on backing up the [Free Software Foundation] and the [Software Freedom Law Center] as much as we can, but it means we won’t be able to use that license insideComputer Technology Articles, because it won’t be practical for us to do so.

Source: Free Articles from ArticlesFactory.com

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Lora covers the emergence of open software and standards in IT Business Edge's Leveraging Open Source weekly report.  Read Lora's blog, Open for Business, to gain insights on open Source solutions for real cost-savings and efficiency



Health
Business
Finance
Travel
Technology
Home Repair
Computers
Marketing
Autos
Family
Entertainment
Law
Education
Communication
Other
Sports
ECommerce
Home Business
Self Help
Internet
Partners


Page loaded in 0.045 seconds