An Effective Strategy to Catch up with Nike

Apr 10
08:23

2012

Arrion king

Arrion king

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Phil Knight established Nike Company in 1972, which was rapidly molded to be a leading brand among global sporting goods industry and many sports brands have to imitate Nike in order to catch up with the rapid expansion rhythm of Nike Company.

mediaimage
Being a legendary character,An Effective Strategy to Catch up with Nike Articles Phil Knight established Nike Company in 1972, which was rapidly forged into a leading brand among sporting products industry all over the world. What is more significant is that in 1980s, Knight practiced the pattern of "asset-light strategy" and nowadays it has proved to be a dominating business pattern in worldwide sporting products industry. Even if those conventional sports brands which have a hundred years history have to select the "Nike style" survival mode so as to follow with the spreading rhythm of Nike Corporation. As for this Phil Knight said "the only way to beat Nike is to imitate us fully and accurately, and then try to find out differences to break up".
In 1992, Chinese excellent gymnast, Lining founded a sports goods company with his own name, and Chinese sporting goods industry entered into "branding" developmental stage. However in the first ten years, most Chinese sporting goods manufacturers are just important OEM partners of Nike's "asset-light strategy" pattern, therefore, a batch of OEM type factories with good manufacturing skills were created. There are nearly 3000 footwear products manufacturing businesses in Jin Jiang, which is a costal city of Fujian province, and there are over 300000 employees, with a yearly output of 650 million pair of shoes Among them, Chen Dai town, with an area of only 38.8 square kilometers, is the main sporting shoes manufacturing base in China and even in the world. At present, Jin Jiang's brands including Anta, 361°, Deer Way, Jordon, JINAK and so on have developed quickly to be the significant contestants in local Chinese sporting products market through the imitation of Nike}.Just as what Phil Knight said, the competition of global sporting goods industry is more and more assimilated to "Nike model". With Lining, Anta on behalf of China native sporting products businesses are also seeking the pattern of "asset-light strategy", which implicates it will be increasingly difficult to exceed Nike.
We could come to a conclusion from the competition of Nike with Reebok and Nike with Adidas: to copy Nike Corporate is surly an efficient tactic to chase it, however wishing to exceed Nike Company is not a matter of using invariably what Knight affirmed.
For example, Rebook surpassed Nike by springing up female sporting goods market, and Adidas is competing with Nike all over the world via merging strategy, and Nike beat back Rebook after finishing global operation, which all prove that those innovative companies that adopted effective strategies according to target market, could win the initiative status in competition.
In 1998 Asian financial crisis, one of Nike Corporation's soft spots was manifested. Because "asset-light strategy" pattern doesn't involve in the process of specific products manufacturing, and this process was produced by Asian OEM factories, which could cause two big managing problems, and one is the supply chain management, another is production quality control. With the economic environment's external fluctuation, Nike Company's overall operating performances are affected by Asian OEM factories' cost, delivery, logistics and so on.