Social intelligence (SI) is a multifaceted concept that has evolved significantly since its inception in the early 20th century. It encompasses the cognitive and practical abilities to understand, manage, and navigate human relationships effectively. This article delves into the historical development of SI, its distinction from general intelligence, and its role as a predictor of social effectiveness. We will explore the integration of emotional intelligence (EI) with SI, the criteria for SI as an intelligence, and the various dimensions that constitute this complex construct.
Social intelligence, a term first coined by psychologist Edward Thorndike in 1920, refers to the adeptness in understanding and managing interpersonal relationships. Thorndike described it as the capacity to act wisely in human relations, a definition that emphasizes both the cognitive and practical aspects of social interactions.
Following Thorndike, researchers like Moss and Hunt, and P. E. Vernon in the 1930s, expanded on the concept, associating it with the general ability to get along with others and the knowledge of social matters. However, it wasn't until the 1980s that Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, which included interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence, rekindled interest in SI. Gardner's model suggested that much of a person's effective intelligence is derived from their ability to leverage the resources of others.
Research in the 1980s, including studies by Ford and Tisak, began to validate SI as distinct from general intelligence and a better predictor of social effectiveness. This period saw a consensus among researchers that SI was a unique construct that played a crucial role in human behavior.
In the late 1990s, the work of Salovey and Mayer introduced the concept of emotional intelligence (EI) as a subset of SI, emphasizing the monitoring and management of emotions in oneself and others. This led to a more nuanced understanding of how SI operates in social contexts.
The debate over whether SI could be classified as 'intelligence' was addressed by researchers Boyatzis and Sala, who outlined criteria for a concept to be considered as such. Daniel Goleman's work, particularly his exploration of the neurological underpinnings of SI, was instrumental in establishing SI as a domain of intelligence.
Karl Albrecht later proposed that humans possess six basic dimensions of intelligence, with SI being one of them. This model defined SI as the ability to interact successfully with others and highlighted the behavioral manifestations of interpersonal awareness.
Goleman and Boyatzis further refined the concept by distinguishing between interpersonal (SI) and intrapersonal (EI) competencies, leading to the integrated concept of ESI. This framework linked personality to action and job performance, positioning ESI as a competency that leads to effective or superior performance.
Bar-On's model of ESI includes a set of interrelated emotional and social competencies that determine how effectively we understand and express ourselves, understand and get along with others, and handle daily activities. This model underscores the importance of both EI and SI in achieving personal and professional success.
Albrecht elaborated on the five major dimensions of SI, which he summarized with the acronym SPACE: Situational Radar, Presence, Authenticity, Clarity, and Empathy. These dimensions highlight the various cognitive abilities and social skills that constitute SI.
Recent research has focused on a potential-based concept of SI, distinguishing between cognitive abilities and social competent behavior. This approach defines SI as a multidimensional cognitive ability construct, supported by data from a multitrait-multimethod study by Weis and Süß in 2007.
Today, SI is recognized as a complex construct that includes knowledge of social situations, accurate interpretation of social cues, and the skills to behave appropriately in various contexts. It is seen as an essential component of human intelligence, as important as cognitive aspects, and is integral to effective interpersonal interactions.
Researchers like Hopkins and Bilimoria have emphasized that being good at human relationships is a key aspect of SI. Crowne defined it as the ability to interact effectively with others in any social situation, while Emmerling and Boyatzis described SI competency as the ability to be aware of, understand, and act on emotional information about others that leads to effective performance.
The interplay between SI and EI is crucial, as one cannot exist without the other. SI involves the ability to relate to people, perceive social situations accurately, and respond appropriately, while EI is essential for managing one's own emotions and those of others.
Social intelligence has come a long way since Thorndike's initial proposal. It has been dissected, redefined, and integrated with emotional intelligence to form a comprehensive understanding of how individuals interact with one another. As research continues to evolve, the significance of SI in personal and professional domains remains a topic of great interest and importance.
For further reading on the development of social intelligence, readers can explore the works of Edward Thorndike, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman, which are available through various academic publications. Additionally, the American Psychological Association provides resources and articles on the latest research in the field of social intelligence.
How HR Persons or Recruiters Can Enhance Their Skills with Social Intelligence
Social intelligence can enrich the repertoire of HR persons by helping them decipher people's real emotional-states through observing nonverbal cues. It’s a valuable tool for hiring, appraisal or even exit interviews
Social intelligence and Detecting Deception!
Read how Social intelligence help you to detect the deceptive activity of an External being.
How to Improve Interpersonal Skills with Social Intelligence?
Social Intelligence supports interpersonal success and fulfillment by developing one’s willingness and ability to ‘understand emotions through observing nonverbal behavior’. It helps one develop that all-important ‘connect’.
