You can claim your luck if know this

Only the food and mate are considered to be the key driving force of the biological existence of all animals, if we analyze the life from an intellectual plane.  Is wisdom of nature is so simple and primitive as all animals exist only for just food and mate?  If so, even the very secret of the biological existence of man is also positioned only in the above principle.   By residing in the fortress of the corporate, can the corporate man learn anything from the melodrama or the idiosyncrasies that are so rampantly present in nature?    Is the beauty, the serenity, the virginity and also the mystery of creation is deeply located in the unequal balance and perfection in imperfectness?  

Most corporate employees usually carry the feelings that some of their colleagues are always favoured or prejudiced by their boss in the corporate and hence they are lucky.  People often yell that be it the salary or the recognition or the promotion are always done in an unfair manner in the organization.   People even adventure to blame their fate and destiny, their previous birth and sometime even the god.  Steadily and rhythmically they spin and tie around themselves with such thoughts & beliefs that they are victims and become immotile. 

They never understand the fact that they were the cause for their state of being and not the fate or destiny or sins of the previous birth or god has made any contribution to it.     

In nature, can we say that the herbivores animals like deer or rhino or buffalo are lucky and fortunate as they have plenty of food to eat?  Food scarcity is relatively less for herbivores animals and also they need not hunt or fight for food because the plants never run away from where they are. 

When we describe the plant eating animals to be lucky, they are also unlucky as they are the easy prey to many carnivores.  They have to live with the fear of predators.

Can we ever say that carnivores animals like lion or tiger are lucky?  All the carnivores’ animals are very powerful, strong and brave.   On the contrary, the plant eating animals are generally very scared and fearful. 

If we accept the carnivores to be lucky, are they not unlucky as they have to struggle and work hard to get food despite being strong. 

Let us leave both the herbivores and carnivores from the list of lucky lot, what about the scavenging animals and omnivores?  They too have limitations and hence they also cannot be called as lucky. 

If none of the above animals are lucky means, who is then lucky?  What about man?  Despite man being so intelligent, he cannot keep his mind free from the unhappy thoughts about his past & the future and in most instances he chooses to be unhappy at present.   So man also cannot be called as lucky.

The beauty of creation also lies in limitations or contradictions like plenty of foods but have to be always scared hunters as in the case of herbivores, very strong and courageous, but have to work very hard for food as in the case of lion or tiger, have to eat and settle with whatever is available as in the case of omnivores, very intelligent even to rule the planet like the man but cannot be happy with what is? 

The luck lies in the ‘struggle to see the opportunity’ and not ‘seeing struggle in the opportunity’.  This is the law of creation and definition of luck by nature.  According to this principle of nature, every creation is lucky in its own way and there is not space for any inequality in its creation.   

The corporate man should learn that none is lucky and none is unlucky also.