White House Lawsuit Highlights E-mail Archiving Challenge

Jul 19
13:39

2010

kieron dowling

kieron dowling

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

When it comes to email archiving, even the White House can’t seem to get it right. The Washington Post recently reported that the Bush administration is being sued for failing to preserve millions of e-mails, a violation of the Federal Records Act.

mediaimage
When it comes to e-mail archiving,White House Lawsuit Highlights E-mail Archiving Challenge Articles even the White House can’t seem to get it right. The Washington Post recently reported that the Bush administration is being sued for failing to preserve millions of e-mails, a violation of the Federal Records Act.For the record, the White House rejects the charge. Moreover, the alleged problem is not confined to the GOP. The Clinton administration suffered its fair share of e-mail controversies, including the loss of hundreds of thousands of e-mails.Politics aside, if the White House can be sued for failure to maintain an adequate e-mail archive, any organization is at risk. That is, assuming it faces the same requirement. And a growing number of organizations – both public and private – are, indeed, required to maintain secure, accessible electronic records, per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Sarbanes-Oxley, the U.S. Patriot Act, HIPAA, SEC rules, and countless state laws and corporate policies.Even companies that do not fall directly under a government or institution regulation for e-mail archiving may be at risk. When such a company does business with regulated organizations, it finds itself increasingly, though indirectly, affected by the regulations imposed on its business partners.In addition to regulatory compliance issues, demand for e-mail archiving comes from exploding use of e-mail and instant messaging. The Radicati Group estimated that a typical corporate e-mail account sent and received approximately 16.4 MB of data per day in 2006. By 2010, the amount is expected to reach 21 MB. Companies need a way to store and manage this growing mountain of electronic messages.Clearly, e-mail archiving is quickly moving from a luxury to a necessity for a growing number of organizations, especially in the small and medium business market. So, how do SMBs, local governments, and other organizations handle e-mail archiving?Sadly, many simply choose to ignore the requirement because they think they can’t afford to meet it. Most solutions are too expensive, in terms of financial, human resources and technology commitments. Other organizations, including the White House, archive their e-mail using inadequate solutions, e.g., backup tapes, their e-mail system, or a combination of both.The trouble is, e-mail systems have no archiving functionality, per se. And tapes can only store what is found on the server at the time of back up. E-mails can easily be deleted or altered prior to backup. Worse, retrieving e-mail from tape can take months and costs millions of dollars.What SMBs and Enterprise organizations need is a cost-effective e-mail archiving solution that is both powerful and simple – simple to deploy, simple to manage, and simple to use. Ideally, an e-mail archive will:* archive, index, retrieve, and dynamically monitor e-mail and instant messages, including message headers, bodies, and attachments (word processing documents, spreadsheets, and .PDF files);* send policy-driven, real-time notifications of compliance or governance infractions;* verify the integrity of archived messages to ensure they have not been edited or otherwise altered;* give end-users, compliance officers, and systems administrators a rich user interface as well as various e-mail client plug-ins;* work with Microsoft Exchange, Novell GroupWise, Lotus Notes, as well as outsourced mail services;* work with enterprise encryption technologies;* be implemented in hours instead of weeks; and* be cost-effective, e.g., $50 per user for an in-house (v. outsourced) solution.As the White House case demonstrates, the threat of non-compliance lawsuits is real. The threat of system crashes due to storage capacity shortfalls is also real. E-mail archiving offers real insurance against both risks. And contrary to popular perception, e-mail archiving is not inherently expensive or complex. With solutions available today that are affordable, powerful, and easy to use, organizations of any size can begin properly archiving their electronic messages.

Also From This Author

Simple Steps to Compliance: Archiving Electronic Messages for Competitive Advantage

Simple Steps to Compliance: Archiving Electronic Messages for Competitive Advantage

The way people communicate with each other in both personal and business contexts has changed dramatically in a few short decades. In today’s virtual, paperless world, massive quantities of information can be transmitted in seconds from one location to another, anywhere in the world.
E-mail archiving demands overwhelm backup alternative

E-mail archiving demands overwhelm backup alternative

One look at the numbers makes it clear that e-mail archiving is still in its early stages. While most large enterprises have deployed first-generation solutions, the mid-market has yet to answer the call to e-mail archiving even though all organizations are subject to the same regulatory pressures and IT demands. The most recent AIIM user survey reveals that 63 percent of organizations have little or no confidence that e-mails related to commitments and obligations made by themselves and their staff are recorded, complete and recoverable.
Canada’s Financial Services Firms Prepare for E-mail Archiving Mandate

Canada’s Financial Services Firms Prepare for E-mail Archiving Mandate

Will multi-million dollar fines, criminal indictments, and exorbitant e-discovery costs play a role in Canada’s financial services future? Possibly, if Canadian securities dealers, portfolio managers, and other financial services firms violate the pending legislation proposed by the Canadian Securities Administrators. By year’s end, these firms will be subject to tough, new e-mail storage and retrieval rules defined in National Instrument 31-103 (NI 31-103).