The Art of Evaluating Websites for Award Programs

Feb 7
09:10

2024

Richard Lowe

Richard Lowe

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Crafting an awards program is only the beginning; the real challenge lies in the meticulous evaluation of submissions. This process involves a detailed comparison of each applicant's website against the established criteria to determine their eligibility for recognition. It's a task that requires a keen eye and a commitment to fairness, ensuring that only the most deserving sites earn the accolade.

The Evaluation Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

When you've successfully launched an awards program and the applications start rolling in,The Art of Evaluating Websites for Award Programs Articles it's time to roll up your sleeves and dive into the evaluation process. This phase is crucial—it's where you sift through the contenders to identify the gems that truly deserve recognition.

Establishing Clear Criteria

The cornerstone of any awards program is its criteria. These benchmarks must be precise, transparent, and accessible to all potential applicants. For instance, a typical set of criteria might include:

  • Fast loading times
  • Intuitive navigation
  • Legible text
  • Completion (not under construction)
  • Absence of broken links
  • High-quality content
  • Option to mute or disable music
  • Proper HTML coding
  • Compatibility with various screen resolutions
  • Respect for copyright laws
  • Exclusion of sites promoting illegal activities or offensive content

The Judging Process

Allocating a few hours each week, judges should systematically visit each site, assessing it against the program's criteria. It's essential to determine whether a site must meet all or just a majority of the criteria to qualify for an award.

Making Judgement Calls

When evaluating a site, it's important to discern whether any shortcomings are within the webmaster's control. For example, if a site is slow to load due to excessive graphics, it may not pass muster. However, if the server speed is to blame, the site may still be in the running.

Navigating the Nuances

The criteria should be applied as they were listed at the time of submission. If a site features a JavaScript menu and it's not against the rules, it cannot be disqualified for that reason alone. However, criteria can be updated for future submissions to reflect any new preferences or standards.

Dealing with Subjectivity

Sometimes, a site may meet all the technical criteria but still be objectionable on moral or ethical grounds. In such cases, it's possible to revise the criteria for future applicants to exclude sites that promote content you find objectionable.

Communicating with Applicants

It's a matter of debate whether to provide feedback to applicants who don't win. However, many experts advise against sending critical comments, as the criteria should make it clear why a site did not qualify. Unsolicited criticism can be disheartening and unproductive for webmasters.

The Importance of Ethics in Awards Programs

An awards program is essentially a contract between the organizer and the applicants. It's imperative to maintain ethical standards throughout the judging process. This means applying the criteria fairly and consistently to all submissions.

The Impact of Awards on Webmasters

Winning an award can significantly boost a webmaster's morale and credibility. According to a survey by Clutch, 62% of small businesses believe that awards are important for establishing credibility on their websites. This underscores the responsibility of award program organizers to conduct their evaluations with integrity and respect.

The Evolution of Criteria

As the internet evolves, so too must the criteria for awards programs. It's important to stay informed about the latest web design trends and technologies to ensure that the criteria remain relevant and challenging. For example, with the increasing importance of mobile responsiveness, award programs now often include mobile compatibility as a key criterion.

Conclusion

Running an awards program is a complex task that goes beyond the initial setup. It involves a continuous commitment to fairness, transparency, and ethical judgment. By adhering to these principles, award programs can maintain their integrity and continue to celebrate excellence in web design and development.