Editing Errors.

Nov 14


Brian J White

Brian J White

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Typically, there are extra editorial eyes on a manuscript published by a publishing house, than on a self-published manuscript.


This is due to the fact that an indie author generally doesn’t have the money to employ a developmental editor,Editing Errors. Articles substantive editor, line editor, copy editor, and proofreader. As an editor of generally self-published books, an effort is made to do as many various degrees of editing as possible in a single move. While this isn’t optimal, an individual edit is normally all the author is able to afford. In such cases, it’s not possible to create a perfect error free manuscript.

Even in big publishing houses, a few errors can slip through cracks. As everybody knows, cutbacks have already been happening frequently in traditional publishing houses these past few decades, and regardless if a manuscript sometimes appears by five modes of editorial eye, generally less attention is paid  to a manuscript as it was during the golden age of publishing.

Last-minute author tinkering may cause residual errors on both personal and traditionally published literature. Some authors simply can’t stop themselves from fussing and fiddling, possibly at the proofreading level. Another observation is that considerably more editorial attention is paid to hardcover literature than to mass-market paperbacks.

As an editor, in the event you correct other editors’ problems on Facebook and other social mass media? Generally,you’ll merely reinforce the stereotype of the editor as a schoolmarmish nit-picker. But if you are an editor, it’s in your very best interest to avoid sloppiness in with any of your valued work connections. Whether it’s through cultural media, e-mailing, and even texting. You could possibly be corresponding with a potential future customer. Stay sharp, and maintain your work values. It will pay off nicely down the road.

If you’re an article writer and you’ve found a blunder in your editor’s job after publication, I could only imagine how cringe worthy such an experience must be. Please try to keep in mind that editors aren’t robots; we’re just doing the very best job feasible with whatever spending and budget constraints we have. Time period constraints, and additional parameters we’ve been provided with are another reason human error can be hard to avoid. Rather than expecting every editor to understand everything, and to be perfect at all times, we all must recognize the gaps and blind spots that we all encounter while working together on a project. Try to take into account that 5% error rate is known as suitable by some in the editorial world. Take into account the hundreds and hundreds of large mistakes your editor did catch to cause you to look better. Get realistic and keep a set of rules to help you resolve them on your own if possible. Even your high school teachers and college professors made mistakes while trying to catch the mistakes of their students.

It always is best to have more than one set of eyes edit a piece of work. Problem is, as always, the cost. We will all do our best with the budgets available.


Article "tagged" as: