Critical Thinking Writing: 4 Steps For Perfect Critical Thinking Writing And Evaluation

Feb 20
09:24

2013

Pitzer Answers

Pitzer Answers

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Success in critical thinking writing rely on one’s ability to understanding original arguments, as well as interpreting them in differing points of views. You use different points of views to assess worthiness, truthfulness, exactness and acceptability of original arguments.

mediaimage

Success in critical thinking writing rely on one’s ability to understanding original arguments, as well as interpreting them in differing points of views. You use different points of views to assess worthiness,Critical Thinking Writing: 4 Steps For Perfect Critical Thinking Writing And Evaluation  Articles truthfulness, exactness and acceptability of original arguments.

Not only is critical thinking helpful for success in academic writing and assignment writing, but also is a skill very helpful in general living. Issue is; you cannot agree to or accept everything said or brought forward by anyone anytime, even in real life. A must-have strategy is developing important critical reasoning about any piece of work or thing. You need awareness of various issues while criticizing any piece of work. Here are steps you can use to effectively perfect your critical ideas for any piece of work;

1.      Identify the author’s main line of reasoning

In critical thinking writing, identification of this line of reasoning has to do with determination of the author’s main argument. Whenever you engage in critical thinking writing, ask what point of view a particular author adopts. In some cases, you may have to identify the points or positions authors defend a lot in their writing. In other cases, you may need to look at the case they support and for which they provide evidence.

You may have to start critical thinking writing by reading a variety of works or materials, either to have an in-depth understanding of matters originally raised by author, or to identify the opposing points of views from a number of other authors. It is not obvious to adopt an already taken point of view in critical thinking: you can raise original opposing points of view as long as evidence exists.

2.      Criticize the line of reasoning

Successful critical thinking writing involves critical evaluation of original lines of thoughts through a careful strategy; to first look at the original information or ideas, analyze them based on a certain criteria, identify with facts on the ground, note flaws in arguments and processes of reasoning and raise opposing ideas supported by evidence.

You need to access whether the reasons given for the original author’s point of view is relevant. In critical thinking writing, find out whether contributions have sufficient propositions. In addition, you need to check if arguments are logical. For instance, if the author arranged ideas in chapters and subsections, you may check if ideas in each of the chapters are logical and fluent.

Critical thinking writing involves identification of; flaws in reasoning, flaws in evaluation and analytical procedures employed, flaws in presentation of data and flaws in conclusions, as well as errors in formula and their statement.

3.      Identify if arguments rely on truth/facts or if they are prejudices

Critical thinking involves assessment of whether arguments are true and whether they are mere prejudices. Valuable statements must rely on truth and be free of prejudices. 

4.      Ensure to question surface appearances

Original authors must identify evidence for positions held or opinions posited. One sure way of criticizing such work in critical thinking is analyzing precision of such evidence. Critical thinking writing also involves analyzing validity of evidence in relation to dates and representation (for example, fairness or lack of it). Ask whether evidence supports conclusions and whether conclusions are reasonable and stand criticisms.