The Three-Phase Traffic Theory

Oct 20
09:04

2011

Dom Triviamaster

Dom Triviamaster

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

personal injury, law, attorney, lawyer, accidents, car accidents, legal, injury, cars, vehicle

mediaimage

Boris Kerner developed a traffic flow theory,The Three-Phase Traffic Theory Articles known as the three-phase traffic theory, over the course of six years. He finalized the theory in 2002. Unlike classical theories, which are comprised of two basic forms of traffic, congested and free flow; Kerner’s theory involves three distinct phases of traffic: synchronized, free flow and wide moving jam. The oddity in this theory is that Kerner uses “wide” to describe length instead of width.

 

Free Flow Traffic

Traffic that moves freely at or near the stated speed limit is considered free flow. Vehicles may pass other vehicles, exit the roadway or enter the roadway with little to no issues. In Kerner’s theory, free flow traffic correlates positively between the rate of flow and the number of vehicles on the roadway. He supports that free flow ends when the maximum flow corresponds to critical density.

 

Congested Traffic

Congested traffic occurs when the too many vehicles are using a particular roadway. Congested traffic can be stable and moving or unstable and still, the latter of which is known as a traffic jam. In Kerner’s theory, the speed of a vehicle in congested traffic is lower than the speed of the slowest moving vehicle in free flow traffic.

 

He supports that small issues may occur on the roadway and vehicles will remain congested, but moving; however, should a larger issue occur, already congested traffic will likely be halted altogether, causing a jam. However, Kerner breaks congested traffic into two forms; synchronized and wide moving jam.

 

Kerner’s Synchronized Flow

Kerner describes synchronized flow as the point at which vehicles are accelerating to meet free flow traffic. In his diagrams and charts, synchronized traffic is fixed in the form of a bottleneck, which is considered a downstream front.

 

Kerner’s Wide Moving Jam

When vehicles move up the highway through bottlenecks like that of Kerner’s synchronized flow and maintain mean velocity while achieving this, Kerner considers this a wide moving jam. As of this writing, it is not known why Kerner chose the term “wide” for this phase of his theory, as his theory actually refers to the length of the traffic congestion rather than the width of the transitional head or tail zones.

 

Kerner’s Fundamental Hypothesis

Kerner’s hypothesis for his three-phase traffic theory is based on homogeneous synchronized traffic flow. What this means is that he based the hypothesis on identical drivers, driving identical vehicles that are all evenly spaced and moving at identical speeds. His hypothesis states that this can potentially occur at any two-dimensional point on the flow-density plane. The states of free flow and synchronized flow on multi-lane roads are separated, both by a flow rate gap and a speed gap at particular densities. The free flow speed will always be higher than that of synchronized flow.

 

In addition, drivers are considered to make arbitrary choices that determine the space gap between their vehicle and the one before them. Therefore, the driver chooses different gaps in space at various times and will not continually use only one specific gap.

 

This article is brought to you by your local West Hollywood car accident attorney. TheCalifornia personal injury lawyers at JD Law Group have settled millions of dollars worth of accident claims and canrefer you to the highest rated car accident firms anywhere in the United States in order to maximizeyour settlement. Call them today at 1-888-736- 4248 for a free consultation.

 

DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website or the web site linked here in is not a substitute for professional medical or legal advice, diagnosis or treatment. In addition, viewing the content on these websites, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form does not form an attorney-client relationship with the sponsoring attorney. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case or scientific study and do not represent a promise or guaranty regarding similar outcome or causes. The information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. Internet subscribers or online readers should not act upon any information contained herein without seeking professional legal and/or medical advice. This firm is licensed to practice law only in the state of California, but is affiliated with a network of licensed attorneys in other states. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. PersonalInjury.org and JD Law Group make no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currentness, or timeliness of the content, text or graphics. Links to other sites are provided for information only — they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites.