The Argument for a Universal Living Wage

Feb 24
04:18

2024

Richard R. Troxell

Richard R. Troxell

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

In the quest to address homelessness and poverty, the concept of a Universal Living Wage (ULW) has emerged as a compelling solution, championed by advocates like Richard R. Troxell. The ULW proposes a wage structure that enables full-time workers to afford basic housing within their communities without exceeding 30% of their income. This approach not only aims to lift individuals out of poverty but also seeks to balance the economic scales between employers and employees, ensuring a fair standard of living for all.

Understanding the Universal Living Wage

The Universal Living Wage is a strategic approach to combat poverty and homelessness,The Argument for a Universal Living Wage Articles built on three foundational principles:

  1. Full-Time Work Equals Housing Affordability: The ULW model is predicated on the idea that a 40-hour workweek should yield enough income for a person to afford basic rental housing anywhere in the United States. This may necessitate part-time workers securing additional hours to reach the 40-hour threshold.

  2. Housing Costs Capped at 30% of Income: Following guidelines set by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the ULW stipulates that no more than 30% of one's income should go towards housing. This standard is also used by banks when assessing mortgage affordability.

  3. Minimum Wage Indexed to Local Housing Costs: Unlike the Federal Poverty Guideline, which is based on food costs, the ULW ties the minimum wage to the local cost of housing, recognizing that housing stability is a critical factor in addressing poverty.

The Housing Affordability Standard

The 30% income standard for housing affordability has been a benchmark for decades. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition's 2021 report, a full-time worker needs to earn $24.90 per hour to afford a modest two-bedroom rental home at the fair market rent and $20.40 per hour for a one-bedroom rental home. These figures highlight the disparity between the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 and the actual cost of living, emphasizing the need for a ULW.

Indexing to Local Housing Costs

The ULW advocates for adjusting the minimum wage based on HUD's Fair Market Rents (FMR), which are calculated annually and reflect the cost of modest rental housing in various regions. The FMR aims to balance affordability with access to a range of neighborhoods, ensuring that assistance programs can serve as many families as possible.

The Impact on Business and Taxpayers

The implementation of a ULW would have significant implications for both businesses and taxpayers. By ensuring that workers can afford basic necessities through their wages, the reliance on government subsidies like the HUD Section 8 Voucher Rental Program could decrease, potentially easing the tax burden. Moreover, businesses would benefit from a more stable and satisfied workforce, which could lead to increased productivity and reduced turnover.

Aligning with Human Rights Principles

The ULW aligns with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which recognizes the right to an adequate standard of living, including housing, as fundamental to human dignity. By adopting the ULW, the United States would take a significant step towards fulfilling these international human rights commitments.

Conclusion

The Universal Living Wage presents a viable and ethical framework for ensuring that all workers can live with dignity and security. By tying wages to the cost of living and promoting housing affordability, the ULW offers a pathway to a more equitable society where the basic needs of every individual are within reach.

For more information on the Universal Living Wage and its advocacy, visit House the Homeless and explore their resources on the Universal Living Wage campaign.