Why QA is important for your business?

Oct 28
20:08

2020

Stellamurugesan

Stellamurugesan

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

All computer systems potentially stand a chance to encounter attacks. In a lot of instances, such attacks come from bugs or errors in application coding. The modern computing methodologies and networking practices have become highly sophisticated.

mediaimage

But it usually relies upon framework connectivity and data exchanged between users and systems. Hence,Why QA is important for your business? Articles it is beyond the control of a single organization. The lacking control in this regard, combining with multiple complexities, makes it extremely troublesome to ensure foolproof security of any system. It is where providers of QA services have a crucial role to play across the development process. 

 

In simple terms, it is impossible to assume that a system will attain a 100% security standard. However, it is still possible to bring the right balance between usability and security management. For accomplishing this purpose, users should be aware of the possible risks and threats involved. Users should be aware of the ways computer systems are targeted. Today, the type of online and system risks and threats have increased several times. In case users are not proficient in handling these threats, it is likely to cause irreversible damage. 

 

Extensive quality assurance is the only effective way to overcome security threats. However, as nothing is perfect under the sun, it comes with its inherent cons. Research suggests that software testing comes with certain downsides that can retard the development and advancement of a business. Here we will discuss some of the significant issues that testing professionals worldwide are encountering these days. 

 

Third party coding is one of the most stringent challenges faced by testers 

 

Applications in modern times feature the collaboration of various components. These components come from various sources. For example, there are in-house, open-source, outsourced, and applications developed for commercial purposes. As the market demands a faster supply of software. Moreover, there is immense competition among software development companies to offer the most competitive rates. For keeping pace with these demands, software companies are majorly relying on codes developed by third Parties. As applications come loaded with third party codes triggers severe security issues. 

 

The third party library is likely to include several bugs. The presence of bugs makes the host application a soft-target to encounter several security issues. It exposes severe concerns as these security issues across various systems on the same framework. 

 

Testers find significant issues with the dynamic Security policies 

 

Information security policies involve pre-approved guidelines for protecting organizational information. The policy document sets an accurate description for different parties involved in the business process and their rights and access to information. The policy document involves the scopes for the policy, categorization of information, and management objective about information handling. 

 

In conventional systems, the security policy comes static. Put in simple words; programmers will merely specify security policy guidelines at the information collection time. But, turning to the modern approaches, systems get into interaction with the outside ecosystem. In such instances, it is impossible to get advanced knowledge about security policies. Hence, security policies feature extreme dynamism in such cases. Hence, the situation demands a comprehensive mechanism that will facilitate security-related decision making during the application runtime. Such mechanisms will inevitably focus on the observation of the dynamic ecosystem. 

 

Modern day software has become exceedingly complicated 

 

Software these days feature excessive complexities. It starts from the aspect of the product design and the process orientations alike. With time, both these aspects are getting more and more intricate. It is mainly due to match market demand. Primitive-level applications and software come with limited scopes of functions and features. However, the recent advancement in the domain of technology, and enhanced dependence on software has brought exceeding intricacies and complexities in the software. Besides, software sizes have expanded significantly. 

 

  1. Complex software features more coding than enhanced communications among different modules and the ecosystem. Rising complexity in the IT functionality makes it vulnerable to exploitation. Often, it turns almost impossible to detect and escape such exploitations. If you consider these challenges, QA professionals are facing severe challenges to cope with the changing technologies. Here come the key issues that will be especially relevant to the state in this context: cxcessive time-lapse, which becomes the primary concern with Quality Assurance against today’s dynamic industry is that it is incredibly time-consuming. Organizations are in severe competition for delivering top-class products within a short time. Software testing involves significant time-lapse. 

 

  1. Drop-in manual testing: compared with the standing, even a few years back, today the industry features a sharp decline in the manual testing efforts. Experts consider manual testing to be more effective over the standard testing measures. However, no significant evidence is available to establish this assumption. The fact is, manual testing is extremely crucial to ensure the qualitative standing of a software. Hence, it is impossible to assume that manual testing will become extinct altogether. 

 

Issues revolving around Test Automation 

 

Test Automation paves the way for improving the result quality, adding dynamism to the testing process, and enhancing the scope of testing. Most importantly, it contributes to downsizing the variation in test results. But, it includes the following cons as well: 

 

  • Poor control and uncertain results 
  • Severe challenges in scalability and maintainance 
  • Below-par testing methodologies and inferior test outcomes 
  • People vs technology issues 

 

Quality Assurance professionals worldwide feel the need for an interactive solution. It implies the need for cutting-edge solutions that can run efficiently in parallel to the conventional systems. But, adequately-planned and well-practiced fundamentals should not get replaced by new concepts completely. Instead, it calls for adequate collaboration between the classic and the contemporary that will enable testing professionals to find the most relevant solutions to their needs. 

 

Even if there are various downsides with Quality Assurance, there is still no alternative to it. Thus, providers of QA Services can expect significant business impetus if they manage to deliver as per the expectations of their clients. It is up to the time to witness how these service providers utilize these potentials to secure their business standing.